Education News

Satire articles on reorganizing humanities (opinions)

All governments performed poorly in the School of Social Sciences and Humanities. Its various departments, programs and other departments have become more and more numerous, so that students themselves no longer understand the difference between philosophy and psychology. p. And, since many students no longer engage in reading or writing without the help of AI, we should stop supporting different majors that encourage both. Therefore, we are reorganizing the school to reflect current academic administration decisions.

Here are some of our problems to prove the recombination theory:

  • There has been a decrease in enrollment recently, or at least it should be there.
  • These are dangerous times for the humanities and working together will help.
  • The merger of departments will make infrastructure more economical, especially if we leave the annoying department offices and office staff.
  • Speaking only the term “interdisciplinary” will make us feel connected to the 21st century.

SSSH currently includes English, history, philosophy, religion, sociology, anthropology, modern languages, linguistics, political science, psychology, classics, and others that may have escaped our attention. However, we hired a consulting firm that can list all of these. The consultant has compiled the PowerPoint presentation and advised them to infer what we want.

The reorganization will adopt programs such as Philohistenglish-Religiosphy (PHER), Anthrosociopsychology (ASP), and two other Smushs with better abbreviations. New flexible professional professions may be grouped into (limited) speech freedom, global awareness of the troubles we are having and plans similar to the Children’s Party’s robbery bags. The armed SSSH administrators will be responsible for maintaining peace, rather than a group of quarrels with department heads and deans, but rather the armed SSSH administrators.

We have surveyed teachers and students with calculated metrics to prove our point of view: At a scale of 1 to 10, please rate your dissatisfaction with the current setting, one of which is “very” and 10 is “extreme”. Twelve respondents responded that they were very dissatisfied. Please note that we are more than willing to take the advice of our teachers and actually invite them to the feedback session held yesterday at 3 a.m. in the Student Center Ballroom (br your own flashlight!). However, we urge teachers not to think in the box and are also flexible in layoffs.

In the process, the SSSH building itself will be reorganized in comparison to the shiny new STEM complex, which may be reorganized into a multi-level parking lot and reserved for all staff administrators. It has also been suggested that teachers themselves can start some reorganization from their mouths, which can be sealed through painless surgical procedures.

Don’t think of it as losing autonomy and common governance. Think this is the benefit of the government!

David Galef is a professor of English and director of the Creative Writing Program at Montclair State University. His latest book is novel Where did I go wrong (Rich House, 2025).

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button