Higher education professionals point out that students today are less involved than previous courses. Many experts attribute this shift to the lack of socialization caused by full-time orders caused by Covid-19. But according to a recent study, student participation rates have been declining over the past decade.
Since 2020, a March report from the Research University (SERU) Alliance Secondary Student Experience (SERU) Alliance found that despite students participating in a variety of campus activities, including academic, civic, career, career, extracurricular and research work, prices remain lower than in 2019.
“The pandemic gives [engagement] …The narrative around it is, ‘Oh, things are back to normal. We are operating normally. You know, on campus, the pandemic has been forgotten…but in the data, we don’t actually see that. ”
Methodology
The report includes 10-year surveys and institutional data from the Seru Alliance, which includes 1.1 million students survey responses from 22 major institutes. The consortium is located at the Center for Higher Education Research at UC Berkeley, where research is conducted in partnership with the University of Minnesota and evaluation company Etio.
The “pre-pandemic” data are classified as reactions collected between 2016 and 2019, and the “post-pandemic” data arrives in 2023. Survey respondents were all students at R-1 residential universities, with high retention and high graduation rates (range 82% to 94%).
Overall decline: The researchers used the 2018-199 participation indicators as reference points to mark the differences between pandemic tests. All charts are focused on changes, so they do not represent a decline in units (such as time spent learning), but they do provide opportunities for comparisons between indicators, Chirikov said.
Most indicators of campus participation have been declining since the onset of COVID-19, and as of 2023, few have returned to pre-pandemic levels.
Academically, students reported significant differences in learning in and out of the classroom and in time interaction with teachers. Learning with peers has also declined during the pandemic, but researchers say this could be due to a shift to online and hybrid formats that create virtual research groups and other digital interactions.
During the 2020-21 academic year, the share of students who showed professors knew or knew their name also declined, and they also refused their confidence that they knew a professor enough to ask for a letter of recommendation from a graduate school. Both factors improved slightly during the 2022-23 school year, but they remained below pre-pandemic levels.
Questions about recommendation letters are of interest to Chirikov, especially as the number of enrollment in universities increases and the ratio of student-teachers increases. “I think it shows that students have someone on campus, like a faculty member who knows them, knows their job and can say something nice to them,” he said.
The participation in teacher leadership research has also declined, from 25% of students in 2018-19 to 20% of them in 2022-23. Rich students can assist in teacher research compared to their low-income peers.
“These are research universities, so their mission is to get students involved in the research and work in the lab, and we’re seeing all of this downturn and equity gaps again,” Chirikov said. “A lot of these opportunities are unpaid and students from low-income families just can’t afford it. It’s a luxury for rich kids.”
Interestingly, participating in extracurricular activities, and interestingly, theorization of researchers in the 2020-21 school year may be due to the reasons students seek new ways to connect with their peers with their social distancing measures.
“The indicator relies less on the infrastructure and opportunities of the university; students work hard to restore it, expand and create different environments and spaces for communication and developing friendships,” Chirikov said.
The following year, extracurricular participation dropped below pre-epidemic levels. Students work less time to student groups and are unlikely to hold leadership positions.
Since the pandemic, students have spent less time performing community services or volunteering and are unlikely to have academic services or community-based learning experiences.
Employment on campus has also been hit – Competing students said they worked on campus during 2022-23 compared to 2018-19, and the students they hired reported working one less hour a week. Additionally, fewer students said they completed internships, practices or field experiences, which coincided with national trends, which suggests that students have more difficulties in ensuring internships. Instead, employment rates on campus have increased after the pandemic, although the hours of student work have declined.
Successful seeds
Noting how students insert campus barriers or confusing obstacles into campuses, some universities and universities have created new programs to address engagement gaps.
- Goucher College creates micro experiences in service learning, allowing learners to participate in small-scale or one-day projects, opening doors for students working in other spaces on campus.
- The University of Miami offers a preparatory webinar series to support students receiving federal work outcomes to identify and secure campus employment opportunities.
- San Francisco State University is part of the California State University system that creates an online hub for students to identify research and creative activities that may be of interest, thereby eliminating information barriers to participation.
- Virginia Commonwealth University encourages faculty to hold open office hours to meet interdisciplinary meetings to promote more interaction between learners and professors.
Among the various participation opportunities, junior college students and older adults are more likely to report participation, which may be associated with previous participation rates prior to participation, or increased individual investment in achieving postgraduate success.
All demographic factors are under control, so the ever-changing student population has no effect on the overall trend, Chirikov said.
so what? Based on their findings, researchers suggest that higher education revitalize student engagement opportunities, especially in the fields of research, community connections, student organizations and career development programs.
Cuts in federal research may further undermine this trend, which Chirikov assumes will vary based on discipline and loss of funds.
Additionally, Chirikov and his co-author wrote that institutions should address participation gaps across demographics, such as low-income and working-class students, who may experience economic and time deficits.
Chirikov said the researchers are currently unpacking the 2024 data to see which of these trends continue or have new changes.
We bet your colleagues will also like this post. Send this link to them to subscribe to our newsletter about student success.
