By Drew Dietsch | publishing
Stephen King Release A long walkThis is an adaptation of his cruel story about the endurance competition that took the life of his competitors. The original story is inevitably grim and bloody. Stephen King knows that no film adaptation avoids violence and degeneration against young boys. He said a lot in recent interviews, but he made a specific comparison that made many not incredible nerds.
Talking about violence A long walkStephen King proposed superhero movies, softened with violent influences. Specifically, he talks about large-scale fixed works involving massive property destruction and how many of these films show any kind of human element in these sequences.
We will understand why this is an unfortunate dilemma, but it is right when Stephen King talks about the fact that superhero movies don’t show the real impact of violence like God.
PG-13 Problem
The main driving force behind Stephen King’s argument about superhero violence is that these movies need to maintain the expected PG-13 rating. However, this has always confused me about my entire mindset. If you show a lot of violence, but don’t show real consequences from this violent act, it’s pure fantasy that only adults (or mature thoughts) can handle completely. However, this is the material we think is more suitable for young people.
So that leaves us where Stephen King criticizes: films targeting young audiences are full of violence, but are not actually portraying it in a way that reflects reality. Thus, violent fantasies become too tame to deal with their subject matter. Of course, it’s all based on trying to pick the heads of the examiners, so who knows what these monsters actually think? But King’s Point rang when telling stories of violence of any kind.
Violence is crucial
Look, I’m not saying Superman Need to be blood or something like that. Importantly, the violence of the story matches the narrative being told. Stephen King proposed all reasons and A long walk Adapt faithfully. It’s not a targeted “single-like event like this book” way, but a bleak heart of a movie that can’t betray Kim’s original story. Violence is not only part of the story, but also the central theme of King’s socio-political commentary.
I love violence in art. Being able to describe violence in art is a necessary catharsis for us as human beings. We are violent creatures, no matter how much we try to fight our original nature. Sometimes the only way to prevent these feelings from becoming a reality is to fictionalize them. That’s what I feel like Stephen King really got his comments. We need to influence violence in pop art, especially if it will be part of trying to tell a crucial story. For some, novels are more effective than reality. They may react more to the character than real kids dying on social media feed.
